Comments on: Mr. Brownlee, if you’re going after Ken Cuccinelli on abortion, you’d better have your facts right http://cuccinelli4ag.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/mr-brownlee-if-youre-going-to-after-ken-cuccinelli-on-abortion-you-better-have-your-facts-right/ A Blog Dedicated to Ken's Attorney General Bid in Virginia Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:51:15 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Ken http://cuccinelli4ag.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/mr-brownlee-if-youre-going-to-after-ken-cuccinelli-on-abortion-you-better-have-your-facts-right/#comment-27 Ken Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:46:28 +0000 http://cuccinelli4ag.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-27 You are correct that John Brownlee is significantly weaker on abortion than Ken Cuccinelli. Many of Brownlee's answers, like this one, show that he is not a man who understands principle. If life begins at conception, should a child be executed for the crime of its father? Cuccinelli is consistently pro-life and John Brownlee evidences by his answer that he is not. You are wrong however, concerning Brownlee's career opportunities to protect children or change Roe v. Wade. The US Attorney is the EXECUTIVE branch, not the judicial branch. However, he could have use the US Attorney position to investigate Planned Parenthood's systematic protection of pedophiles. There is no evidence that he did so, so I would agree that John Brownlee has not lifted a finger to protect unborn children or their mothers during his career to date. Brownlee's only experience in the judicial branch was the year that he clerked for federal Judge Samuel Wilson in Abingdon, Virginia. You are correct that John Brownlee is significantly weaker on abortion than Ken Cuccinelli. Many of Brownlee’s answers, like this one, show that he is not a man who understands principle. If life begins at conception, should a child be executed for the crime of its father? Cuccinelli is consistently pro-life and John Brownlee evidences by his answer that he is not.

You are wrong however, concerning Brownlee’s career opportunities to protect children or change Roe v. Wade. The US Attorney is the EXECUTIVE branch, not the judicial branch.

However, he could have use the US Attorney position to investigate Planned Parenthood’s systematic protection of pedophiles. There is no evidence that he did so, so I would agree that John Brownlee has not lifted a finger to protect unborn children or their mothers during his career to date.

Brownlee’s only experience in the judicial branch was the year that he clerked for federal Judge Samuel Wilson in Abingdon, Virginia.

]]> By: Mr. Brownlee, if you’re going after Ken Cuccinelli on abortion, you’d better have your facts right « The right-wing liberal http://cuccinelli4ag.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/mr-brownlee-if-youre-going-to-after-ken-cuccinelli-on-abortion-you-better-have-your-facts-right/#comment-8 Mr. Brownlee, if you’re going after Ken Cuccinelli on abortion, you’d better have your facts right « The right-wing liberal Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:09:30 +0000 http://cuccinelli4ag.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-8 [...] Cross-posted to Bloggers for Ken Cuccinelli [...] [...] Cross-posted to Bloggers for Ken Cuccinelli [...]

]]>